After years of awaiting restitution and watching their lawsuit disappear, Marriott timeshare owners are back for vengeance. On the 20th of last month, former class members, alongside their representation, plead with the 11th circuit court to revive their dismissed ruling and reopen the arranged Marriott lawsuit immediately. One can only assume the effects of the Coronavirus played a role in their secondary restitution efforts.
What Was the Initial Timeshare Problem?
Nonetheless, the initial class action claim accused Marriott Ownership Resorts of manipulating timeshare prospects into purchasing baseless real estate contracts through timeshare “points programs.” Anthony and Beth Lennen led the charge then and continue to do so today. Aside from financial hardship and potential fraud, the former plaintiffs argue that the decision to dismiss their suit does not follow Florida property laws.
The class member’s attorney echoed their argument. “The points are not property under any law,” he told the 11th circuit panel. According to the plaintiffs, the Marriott Vacation Club’s Destinations Trust Points Program (MVC Trust) violates Florida law because it is “disguised as a real property interest”.
A federal judge previously agreed that consumer deeds for the MVC Trust timeshare product are void because they lack valid legal descriptions of the property interests being conveyed. “[Florida’s] timeshare statute expressly excludes these types of interests from being sold as timeshares,” the Marriott lawsuit went on to say.
Both Sides of Argument Leverage Florida Law.
“In order to find otherwise, you’d have to find that the Florida Legislature created property rights on par with actual partitionable land,” their attorney stated. This is all rather interesting as timeshares have been steadily evolving into point based structures that provide more revenue and control. Traditional timeshares involve fractional interest in real properties that people can reserve for a week (or two) at a time.
The Marriott lawsuit claims that MVC owners were given increments of points to book nightly stays at various Marriott condos, like a travel club. Marriott’s attorney, Elliot Scherker, counter argued that the timeshare deeds “in the transaction identify a timeshare estate as the property interest being conveyed, and under the law, that timeshare estate is real property.”
Co Conspirators Labeled in Marriott Lawsuit.
Although the original Marriott lawsuit was dismissed, class members believe a number of entities aided the timeshare conglomerate out of selfish gain and negligence. The Lennens have been especially vocal about the involvement of Orange County (OC) and First American Financial Corporation in the “scheme”. Both were (and are still) being accused of illegally recording deeds and arranging titles that benefit the timeshare resort.
According to the Lennens, they should never be on the hook for property ownership costs (Fees for maintenance, assessments, closing costs, etc..) if they do not own a true share of the property – and the benefits that come with ownership. They believe the product is nothing more than a license to use “selected corporate-owned timeshare estates in various locations across the country,” they said.
Marriott’s Accusers Dig Deep for Motives.
While the Lennens are frustrated with the result of their alleged misrepresented purchase, they’re just as concerned about Marriott’s future intentions. Class members believe the hotel chain is dealing with heightened costs due to holding tens of thousands of timeshare properties during the 2008 real estate market collapse.
Although this may be difficult to prove, a points-based product may have given Marriott an ability to “monetize its inventory or corporate owned estates while avoiding related costs.” The Marriott lawsuit points heavily to these accusations.
Even though a majority of the class action’s arguments were dismissed by March of 2019 (3 years later), they did so “without prejudice”, this gave plaintiffs a sense of hope they’re still holding onto. At the recent 11th Circuit meeting, members from Orange County, Marriott and First American were in attendance.
More On the Meeting and Those Involved.
During the plaintiff’s proposal, U.S. Circuit Judge Andrew Brasher questioned whether they had suffered “any injury” from the timeshare deeds that had not been voided. Victims responded by saying they’ve “had to take on the burdens associated with property ownership, like title policy premiums, taxes and maintenance fees,” since making the purchase. But instead of receiving actual real estate, they got limited points. This is still a problem in their eyes – and they’re not alone in their rebuke.
The Marriott lawsuit is filed under Lennen et al. v. Marriott Ownership Resorts Inc. et al., case number 19-13215, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Judges Robert J. Luck, Andrew Brasher and Beverly Martin sat on the 11th Circuit panel in November. Marriott Ownership Resorts was represented by Elliot H. Scherker, Brigid F. Cech Samole and Katherine M. Clemente of Greenberg Traurig PA. Stay tuned to see what transpires.
9 Responses
I recieved a timeshare in a company contest and it was deeded to me as the owner. I had never listened to the information associated with the ownership or maintenance of the timeshare. When I figured out how to properly use the elements involved in the securing of vacation weeks and the availability to send the week to Interval International (II) for exchange, I started using it that way. After several years of ownership, Marriott decided they would change the way that owners could use the property they supposedly owned. The details of how to get the best use of your timeshare totally changed from when it was awarded to me. Now Marriott comes up with the idea, if they make the property only worth an arbitrary number of points, they could restrict availability of many properties I and many had been using over several years. I now could not use II in the same manner as before and II told me that they had a much smaller inventory around the world because owners now could only use the number of points awarded in the new system. I would have to buy additional points to value up to certain places I had traveled for years. Traveling to your own resort or lower value places (points) were the only way to travel or spend more money with Marriott to go where I’ve been going for years. THE GAME CHANGED! I didn’t change it, Marriott and after millions had bought timeshares (TS) based on what they were told under the old system. You could still exchange with II but the chance of getting the same places as in the past were slim or none. I went to Aruba for example about 13 times because owners there were exchanging for other places and their place was open the exchange and I did. Now the points only gave us fewer availability in places because I didn’t have enough points to go to Aruba as an example. Remember, I was given the timeshare, I didn’t buy it, but now they want me to continue to pay the now exorbitant fees as they grew over the years and the value went down as the price went up, not only for fees but to buy more points from Marriott. I felt like I was buying the property all over again. I didn’t have the thousands of dollars the others paid for the TS but I also didn’t want to have to spend more now because Marriott found a way to make me and others do the same. I spoke with several Marriott owners that felt the same way, but with apparently no recourse. No court should allow this type of illicit action to take place, Reinstate the system or let us go without having to continue for something wit hear less value than it had, brought about by the sellers (Marriott) actions. HELP!!
I bought a three bedroom prime season deeded to me. I don’t get the trades I use to and it is of no use to me anymore. I always thought Marriott was an above board company and it was while Bill ran it. It is a shame that it is what it is now!
I did the same. I refused to enroll in the points program though I was hugely pressured to do so. That seemed like even more of a rip off than my deeded week.
I was contacted by a law firm yesterday who is trying to organize owners with regards to Marriott allegedly renting the timeshares on Airbnb for less than what owners are paying for maintenance. The cheating of owners continues.
We purchased a Vacation Club based on points from Marriott while in Hawaii. The sales rep told us at that point we could use the program to stay at a home in St John – showed us pictures of it and everything. This was not true. We had to be at a different level to even access this home. We were told we could sell the timeshare back – for what we paid- and now I find out that is NOT true. I called Marriott today to start this process and was told they decided to stop offering BuyBack. How can they legally do this? We have tried for 3 years to schedule a vacation – a 2 day trip or a week at several places. They are always booked up even if we try months in advance. They have oversold their vacation clubs. We attended 3 other sales presentations trying to get help with this – one in Florida, one in NY City and one in St John. We were told in NY City that we could use our points to stay at the Westin in St. John once the sale was complete. The sale is complete. Has been for some time. Guess what – no availability. So while in St John this summer – we had to rent a villa on our own of course – we visited the Westin. They do not even participate in the points program. There you buy a week in a certain house. They whole yada yada about you owning property. Marriott lost in a class action suit along with the Florida court that was supposedly registering “deeds” in property to our timeshare. This is ridiculous. I , like an idiot, paid off my timeshare with a $33,000+ check. Now they tell me I can just relinquish my membership so I can stop paying my annual maintenance fees of $1800 – which we of course pay every year without being able to go anywhere! Stay away from Marriott or any property they try to sell you. They cannot be trusted and they somehow are getting away with this. It’s time for another class action suit. Anyone want to join me?
Try selling on redweek.com. I have a deeded 2 bedroom and points . If I stay at my home resort it’s the best value or I can convert to points but due this only if I can’t book a time I want. Converting to points can be banked and it takes more points to get my 2 bedroom than they give .. the lie I got was when I bought points I got to executive level BUT I can’t book 13 months out unless I convert my 2 bedroom deeded property. So I have a 12 month booking window even at executive level.. when I bought in 28 years ago no points existed and mariott nolonger manages Kauai beach resort so now Sonesta manages all shared areas including pool. They sell day passes and I don’t like being blindsided by Marriott..
Destination points that were bought have zero value. We were misled by Marriott.
Is there any update on reviving the class action lawsuit against Marriott for the Destination Points?
8750 of our points have just been devalued by Marriott due to the fires in Maui. They had to cancel our reservation, of course, but refuse to give us the 8750 points back except in a 60 day holding account. They’ve had my points for 13 months, now I cannot use them to go anywhere but to places available for 60 days in advance or less. This is fraud! I paid an amount for the points, now I can only use them within the next 12 months for left-over available places, i.e. LEFTOVERS if available! Yes, I’m ready to be in a lawsuit with others because Marriott is hosing everyone that owns a time share, or points, or mixtures. No apologies, “firm” managers. And, don’t buy the insurance they offer….. in case you haven’t read the policy, it doesn’t state the fact that the points are not returned to you, they are devalued by some formula and only a portion is returned to you in cash.
In reviewing our holdings, we purchased 20 + years ago two properties, platinum weeks. Maintenance fees alone pencil out to about $500 a night for our Kauai property. on would think that buying real property 20 years ago the value of the property should keep pace with surrounding property values, instead dropped? So along with the high maintenance, unreasonable point value exchange, the promise of the glossy owners brochure shows amenities that were never delivered (tennis courts). Now the Kauai Beach Club property is owned by Sonesta and services are being reduced from original contract agreements. If the “real property” values were realized and shared by Marriott our 20k vacation investment, after all inflated fees still should have increased as real property to 40k? The surrounding homes / property increased what percent?